During an analysis one value for identifying a segment was set to “100” (it identified a sales channel). During the analysis (notebook feature), suddenly Julius used “99” for that segment thus spoiling the results.
Steps to Reproduce
Load data
Define value “100” in field “filiale” as “online”
Do some analyses (worked fine)
Suddenly get feedback that “99” was not found and therefore no segment online existed (definately wrong)
Corrected via prompt
Solved (but truely major blow to trust in system).
Shows original prompt:
Shows reaction a few prompts later (no change done by me):
Correction attempt by prompt:
Result of correction by Julius:
Julius proposed a data validation protocol after the bug. However, those redesignations of data should never happen, no protocol needed.